¾ÅÉ«ÊÓÆµ

subscribe

Acquisition Motives and the Distribution of Acquisition Performance

Author: MaryJane Rabier

Publication: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 38, No. 13, 2017

´¡²ú²õ³Ù°ù²¹³¦³Ù:Ìý

Research summary:

I examine how acquisition motives relate to the distribution of post-acquisition performance. I argue that acquisitions motivated by operating synergies have the potential to experience greater gains than acquisitions driven by financial synergies but are harder to value and implement, making them more uncertain. Using SEC filings, conference calls and press releases to capture acquisition motives, I find that acquirers pursuing operating synergies are more likely to experience highly positive and highly negative long-term returns than acquirers pursuing financial synergies.

I also find that acquisition experience and geographic proximity to targets soften acquirers' extreme downside outcomes in operating synergy acquisitions. My theory and results suggest that approaches that emphasize average outcomes for acquirers and use industry classifications to capture acquisition motives may be incomplete.

Managerial summary:Ìý

Managers engage in acquisitions for various reasons. In this study, I find that reasons related to operating synergies (e.g., revenue growth through new product offerings or cost savings through economies of scale) are more likely to result in extreme high and low performance outcomes for the acquiring firm compared to reasons related to financial synergies (e.g., diversification of cash flow streams).

In addition, I find that the acquirer's prior acquisition experience and the geographic proximity between the target and acquirer help soften the extreme low performance outcomes related to operating synergies.Ìý

Read full article: Strategic Management Journal

Published: 28 Sep 2017

Monetizing Freemium Communities: Does Paying for Premium Increase Social Engagement?

´¡³Ü³Ù³ó´Ç°ù²õ:ÌýBapna, R.,ÌýRamaprasad , J.,ÌýUmyarov , A.

Publication: MIS Quarterly, 42(3), 719-735

´¡²ú²õ³Ù°ù²¹³¦³Ù:Ìý

Making sustainable profits from a baseline zero price and motivating free consumers to convert to premium subscribers is a continuing challenge for all freemium communities. Prior research has causally established that social engagement (Oestreicher-Singer and Zalmanson 2013) and peer influence (Bapna and Umyarov 2015) are two important drivers of users converting to premium subscribers in such communities. In this paper, we flip the perspective of prior research and ask whether the decision to pay for premium subscription causes users to become more socially engaged. In the context of the Last.fm music listening freemium social community, we establish, using a novel 41 month long panel dataset, a look-ahead propensity score matching (LA-PSM) procedure coupled with a difference-in-difference estimator of the treatment effect, that payment for premium leads to more social engagement. Specifically, we find that paying for premium leads to an increase in both content-related and community-related social engagement. Free users who convert to premium listen to 287.2% more songs, create 1.92% more playlists, exhibit a 2.01% increase in the number of forum posts made, and gain 15.77% more friends. Thus, premium subscribers create value not only for themselves by consuming more content, but also for the community and site by organizing more content and adding more friends, who are subsequently engaged by the social diffusion emerging from the focal user’s activities.

Read full abstract: MISQ, December 15, 2016Ìý

Published: 11 Jan 2017

Measuring the Efficiency of Category-Level Sales Response to Promotions

´¡³Ü³Ù³ó´Ç°ù²õ:ÌýTrivedi, M.,ÌýGauri, D.K., Yu, M.Ìý

±Ê³Ü²ú±ô¾±³¦²¹³Ù¾±´Ç²Ô:ÌýManagement Science, Vol. 63, No. 10, October 2017ÌýÌý

´¡²ú²õ³Ù°ù²¹³¦³Ù:Ìý

Published: 6 Oct 2016

Pages

Back to top